Posts Tagged ‘Recovery Audit’

Lavante Is Honored to Receive Technology Excellence Award from PayStream Advisors

Thursday, October 4th, 2012

Lavante receives technology excellence awards for recovery audit At last month’s PayStream Advisors Fast Track to P2P Automation Summit in Charlotte, NC, Lavante was honored to be included in the technology innovation awards which were announced at the event.  The award was in the category of Purchase to Pay Automation for Leading Recovery Audit Solution.

I see this as a strong validation of what has been the cornerstone to our approach of building and applying advanced technology to automate and streamline what were highly manual, costly and disjointed processes in AP and finance.  In this case, our patented technology and processes help AP to have in place an automated, ongoing recovery process that delivers continuous benefits, including dollars to the bottom line, dynamic reporting, and updated vendor data.

This was reinforced by Henry Ijams, Managing Director of PayStream Advisors, in the award announcement:  “Lavante’s Recovery+ solution automates a traditionally highly manual recovery audit process, providing a comprehensive, automated, and continuous recovery solution. We are proud to honor Lavante with the award in this year’s Purchase to Pay Automation category for Leading Recovery Audit Solution.”

We are pleased to be part of this prestigious awards program and to share the stage with two other technology excellence recipients, Ariba and SciQuest, as well as the Corporate award winners, Graham Packaging Company, The American Red Cross, and Kaleida Health.

To read the complete award summary, please click here, and for more information about Lavante’s excellence award please read the full press release by clicking here.

divider image

A Leading Healthcare Provider Recovers $300,000 in Lost Credits Thanks to a Lavante Recovery Process

Monday, July 16th, 2012

Earlier this year, Lavante Recovery+ recovered an over $300,000 credit for our client, a  leading healthcare provider.  The story of how this credit was identified and recovered is a testament to the effectiveness of an ongoing, continuous audit that leverages technology to update supplier contact details through an extensive supplier network all while providing real time visibility into the relevant supplier communications and audit details.

Here’s how it happened.  In late 2009, a statement was received from a vendor showing little activity and no credits.  A few months later, as a part of the periodic supplier statement refresh process, Lavante requested updated information from this vendor.  At first, the vendor did not respond and the credit, created only two months after the last statement was received at Lavante, went unnoticed.  Luckily for this healthcare provider, however, Lavante’s communications with the supplier didn’t stop there.  When subsequent automated requests went unanswered, they were followed up with phone calls to obtain updated information, a process which was accelerated because several key pieces of contact information (phone number and fax number) were updated automatically through Lavante Supplier Network™.  Once the statement was received from the supplier and processed through Lavante”s automated Fax to OCR technology, the credit was quickly identified.  Immediately, follow up began as Lavante’s experienced audit specialist went to work to contact the vendor and verify the claim.  In subsequent discussions with the vendor, she discovered that the credit was generated when the healthcare company cancelled an already paid-for project and the money was left on the books and overlooked.  The vendor told the auditor that they would be willing to issue a refund check to clear the item.  For nearly two and a half years, the vendor was just waiting for someone to claim this money and was glad when they were able to properly close the transaction.

Lavante Recovery+ shows the number of suppliers changed

Figure 1:  This graph shows the number of vendor details which have  been updated using the Lavante recovery process.
In this example, over 7,000 suppliers have been updated, which equals over 60% of the suppliers contacted.

Successful credit recoveries after communications between the buyer and the supplier have ceased depends on access to up-to-date supplier contact information.  This credit had been aging undetected for over two years, and without updated records that could drive successful outreach, this large credit could have eventually been lost forever.  Mary Schaeffer, Editor & Publisher of AP Now and Tomorrow, speaks to this danger in the whitepaper, The Case of the Disappearing Credits , in which she exposes the potential for companies to permanently lose vendor credits if an ongoing, comprehensive statement audit is not practiced.  The paper reinforces the lessons learned with this large credit recovery that a continuous recovery methodology is critical to a successful statement audit.  With such an effort, companies realize on-going dollars to the bottom line coupled with the reassurance that no vendor credit goes unnoticed and unclaimed.  Furthermore, it is critical that vendor outreach is part of the Accounts Payable process to ensure credits are identified accurately and on a timely basis.

Another part of this recovery process is giving the user full visibility into the audit process – in real time.  As shown in the Figure 2 below, the Lavante Recovery+ user had full access to all related documents, including the credit verification and check request forms, through an automated workflow interface.  The Lavante auditor was able to coordinate all efforts via this same portal, and the refund was delivered in less than 30 days after it was first identified.


Figure 2: Users can quickly review and process credits online through the Lavante Recovery+ application interface, which provides click-through access to all back-up documents.

Needless to say, the healthcare provider was delighted with the results, and saw yet another benefit from an ongoing recovery process instead of using more infrequent project-oriented audits.  They stated they would have been impressed with a $30,000 credit, but were absolutely amazed that a credit over ten times as large had gone undetected by normal AP controls and was quickly resolved by Lavante.

As Mary Schaeffer finds in The Case of the Disappearing Credits, “…an ongoing process means the maximum credit dollars can be recovered in a timely basis.”  The very real impact of a continuous recovery process detailed in this example reinforces the critical components a recovery solution must contain in order to drive this level of results, which include: including the ability to:

  • •    Perform ongoing outreach to the breadth of the supplier base;
  • •    Leverage an expansive supplier network;
  • •    Provide real-time access to the entire audit process through an on-demand web portal;
  • •    Include an experienced audit team that can see claims through to the end.

A more traditional audit project simply does not have the capability and software to execute this level of success.  Lavante’s process ensures statements are received, credits identified, and accurate results are delivered to customers on a regular basis.  I welcome your feedback about this process and learn more about how you are working to resolve unclaimed credits at your company.

______________

Added note.  Jeff recently joined Lavante as a Sr. Consultant, coming to Lavante after his position as Director of AP at Rite Aid.  Click here to learn more about Jeff’s experience in the AP industry.


 

 

divider image

Lavante Recognizes AP Thought Leaders at Fusion 2012

Monday, July 9th, 2012

For those of you who were able to attend the IFO Fusion 2012 conference in Nashville, I hope you had a chance to stop by Lavante’s booth and have your “catch the wave” photo taken!  Also, and more I hope you were able to attend one of Lavante’s five panel discussions that were headlined by some of the finest thought leaders in accounts payable today. We were so pleased to collaborate with so many experts in the AP field to develop and present these five very different, content-rich  presentations.  In an effort to recognize these individuals and their contributions to the AP industry, Lavante presented each panelists with a Lavante AP Thought Leadership Award.

We value the contributions made by these AP professionals.  They not only spent considerable time and effort to create the presentations, but they were all willing to openly share their individual experiences and perspectives about their companies and departments.  Ultimately, it is this type of interactive, open exchange that advances forward-thinking approaches and methodologies in the accounts payable field.  It is an honor to be part of these discussions and to work with such an experienced and insightful group of AP professionals.

We wanted to take a few minutes to recognize each of these experts who contributed so much to these panels and the AP industry:

  • •    Future of AP:  Five Ways to Drive Excellence & Increase the Value of AP
    Josh Morrison, Manager, Vendor Relations, C&S Wholesale Grocers, Inc
  • •    Supplier Portals 101:  What you Need for Effective Supplier Information Management Systems
    Desiree Clayton, Director, Nordstrom
    Tina McGlasson, AP Manager, Omnicare
    Jennifer Barnett, Former System Manager, Accounts Payable, Summa Health
  • •    Transforming AP through  Technology & Automation
    Kathy Sharp, Executive Director of Accounts Payable at MGM Resorts International
    Terri Dunn – Operations Manager, Transactions at Jones Lang LaSalle
    Jennifer Barnett – Former System Manager, Accounts Payable, Summa Health
    Fran Hammer, Manager, Disbursements & Travel, Hershey’s
  • •    Case of the Disappearing Credits
    Mary Schaeffer, Editorial Director and Publisher, Accounts Payable Now & Tomorrow
    Sharon Warmboe, Manager, Accounts Payable, Gilead
    Patty Gustaveson, Assistant Manager, Audit & Controls , Nordstrom
  • •    Cool Tools in AP
    Tom Lyman, Director of Accounts Payable, Saftey-Kleen
    Josh Campbell, Senior Finance Manager, Disbursements, Humana

If you want more information about the presentations and the Lavante AP Thought Leadership Awards presented at the conference, please contact me directly at joe.flynn@lavante.com.

Lavante Connect

divider image

Lavante to Host Ask the AP Experts Sessions at Fusion 2012

Friday, May 11th, 2012

IFO Fusion 2012 is just around the corner.  Lavante is planning a lively, event-filled presence this year, adding a new feature to our booth presence which we call Ask the Experts.  We have invited a host of AP industry experts who will be available at our booth to facilitate a discussion around a variety of AP-related topics.  But, you can also feel free to just drop by to ask another question or bring up a AP hot- topic of your own.

Here is the current line up:

Tuesday, May 15:

  • • 9:45 – 10:15am: Mary Schaeffer, editorial director and publisher of Accounts Payable Now and Tomorrow, will focus on Fraud, as covered in her book Fraud in Accounts Payable: How to Prevent It
  • • 10:30 – 11:00am: Jeff Ulanoski, Sr. Solutions Consultant, Lavante, and former AP Director, Rite Aide, will look at automating the vendor reconciliation process, with a special focus on retail
  • • 12:30 – 1:00pm: Vinay Ambekar, SVP Engineering, Lavante, will be available to answer all of your questions about Security and SaaS.

Wednesday, May 16:

  • • 10:30 – 11:00am: Jeff Wiest, Solutions Consultant, Lavante, and former AP Manager, Tyco Electronics, will focus on the value of credit recovery through the acquisition integration process.

All Meet the Experts sessions will take place at the Lavante Booth at Fusion, #904.  We will be including information gathered at these sessions throughout the day on the HUB, so if you aren’t at Fusion stay tuned for updates!   For more information, please feel free to contact us.

divider image

Benefiting from a Prescription for Clean Data: A Case Study

Tuesday, January 24th, 2012

A recent case study developed by Spend Matters details  how a North American and global procurement organization for a top five pharmaceutical company applied a defined exercise and solution implementation from Lavante to discover where it had excess risk exposure, lack of policy compliance, over payments and other cost driving issues. The procurement organization, which primarily focused on order-to-cash, procure-to-pay, credit and collections was ultimately able to trace all of its challenges in these areas back to weak or missing vendor data.

As the case study details, the company already had some of its vendor data under active management, but many vendor data points required enhanced management. Critical data with inaccuracies included:  remit-to addresses, parent child connections, duplicate vendor entries and incomplete fields including TIN, email and fax numbers.

If the organization had embarked on its data cleansing efforts internally, the benefits would not have cost-justified the task. As such, it decided to work with an external partner. After evaluating a number of providers, this pharmaceutical company selected Lavante based on the power of its underlying technology and the portal it offers to access it. Lavante also offered a breadth of coverage to reach the majority of the pharmaceutical company’s vendors rather than just the top 10-20% of its vendors.

The company implemented the change process by centralizing data quality through one common channel in order to ensure accurate books. To achieve this, the solution was integrated with the pharmaceutical company’s vendor outreach and registration process through four key components: validation, updates, augmentation and de-duplication to primarily find duplicate payments.

To read more about this process, download the full case study by clicking here.
It clearly demonstrates how this global pharmaceutical company was able to recover $5MM in credit opportunities based on a total spend of $10 billion. In order to have the same EPS impact, the organization estimated they would have needed to generate between $50MM and $100MM in new sales.

An underlying platform for credit recovery proved to be the key success factor. Previous, largely manual consultant-led activities focused on only top vendors and their “statement reviews” and led to a lower recovery rate. In contrast, the Lavante platform cast a wider net, and this broader reach resulted in additional recovery opportunities that had been previously overlooked. This was critical for this pharmaceutical company as the top 10-20% of vendors were already “over-farmed” and the next tier down was where the most significant potential for recovery was found.

divider image

New Resources and Best Practices Advice: Lavante In The News

Wednesday, January 18th, 2012

Word is spreading like wildfire. Articles featuring best practices and tips on credit recovery from Lavante have been hitting the streets over the past two months. If you are looking for some expert advice on how best to put dollars back to your bottom line, the following articles may give you the valuable insight you need.

Procedures and Fixes for Vendor File ManagementAP Journal Online, January 2012.
Sherry DePew, Lavante’s vice president of product management, outlines the value of vendor files and an ongoing process for vendor-file cleansing.

Best Practices for Ongoing AP to AR Reconciliation in the Supply and Demand Chain, Accounting Software 411, January 2012
In this piece, Lavante CEO Joe Flynn shares valuable best practices to help companies drive a successful statement audit with their supplier base.

Finding the Dollars in the Haystack, Institute for Supply Management, December 2011.
Here, Henry Ijams, an analyst at PayStream Advisors, offers real world advice on statement auditing, with best practice methodologies in selecting a technology solution to conduct a comprehensive recovery audit that maximizes results. He outlines effective methods to uncover missing credits while reinforcing positive communication and liaison with valued suppliers.

Creative Credits – How Vendors Can Use Your Credits to Their Benefit if You’re Not Looking, Financial Operations, December 2011.
This article, written by Lavante’s vice president of product management, Sherry DePew, gives readers a unique view into the risks associated with leaving vendor credits on the books.

In addition to these resources, you’ll find a wealth of best practices and real-world guidance by joining an upcoming Lavante event or on-demand webinar.

divider image

Supplier statement audit can provide important insights before your next sourcing decision

Monday, August 8th, 2011

With the increasing pressures on the profit margins, the efficiency of the procure-to-pay (P2P) processes has been under intense scrutiny within an enterprise.  Typically, Procurement and Finance organizations manage various aspects of P2P processes.  Thus, for a successful execution of the entire P2P process, each organization needs to understand the actions and motivations of the other.  This P2P mindset threads procurement and payment activities into one continuous lifecycle.

With this in mind it is a worthwhile to consider the details of the entire cross-functional process.  At the front end, one will encounter any number of sourcing and procurement activities where highly trained professionals are chartered to identify the best possible suppliers to buy the best possible products or services at the best possible cost of ownership.  At the far end of the P2P lifecycle, one will encounter Accounts Payable (AP) department whose goal, as told to me by one industry expert, is very simple, “To pay the right entity, the right amount, at the right time.”  This is a simplification of course, but generally, all professionals in the space are pursuing some combination of these stated objectives.

Typically these departments are measured, evaluated and guided through an exhaustive suite of metrics.  A number of sophisticated software applications and service providers stand ready to review, in fine detail, how efficiently resources are being spent across commodities, geographies, business units and supplier types.

Having been a practitioner in this space, I can tell you that even though the concept is simple, AP departments face a number of external factors that constantly challenge their ability to achieve transactional perfection.  As a result, the last decade has seen the emergence of “supplier statement audit” which routinely reviews the transactional (read: payment) history of the enterprise to determine the efficiency of the supplier payment processes.  For too long such supplier statement recovery auditing has been confined to the AP suite as a tool for improving the efficiency of Accounts Payable.  With increased focus on the broader P2P process, supplier statement recovery audit results should be more frequently evaluated by the procurement professionals in the context of the larger supplier management process.

There are many benefits to combining supplier statement audit results into the associated procurement metrics, such as supplier scorecards or spend analytics.  Procurement departments have as much or more to gain by evaluating the results of the recovery effort as do AP departments.  Here are just a few ways procurement can gain from incorporating a review of statement audit results:

      • Statement audits can reveal profit leakage, which procurement needs to understand in order to assess larger budgeting or savings opportunities that may exist. 
      • Analysis of recovery claims can reveal valuable  insights that will better inform future procurement activities, such as  overlooking the related nature of separate suppliers and missing out on pricing  discounts. 
      • Procurement can identify suppliers that routinely  commit transactional errors and incorporate those suppliers’ lack of accuracy in  the supplier scorecard for a more holistic supplier evaluation. 

As a best practice, build in a process to review supplier statement audit results before your next supplier strategy review.  It will provide important insights for managing suppliers.

I would welcome your thoughts on this topic.

divider image

Top 5 Changes Coming to AP – Collaboration and Cooperation

Wednesday, July 27th, 2011

Top 5 Changes to AP

In this post, I’d like to present the final two changes we see coming to AP, that will drive efficiencies and increase the value that AP brings to an organization.  In two previous posts, we covered the first three changes:

1.  More Importance Will be Given to the Quality of Supplier Information
2.  Supplier Networks Become a Reality
3.  Technology Provides New Ways to Automate AP Systems & Processes

Here, I present some ideas related to the final two changes:

4. Buyers & Suppliers Collaborate
5. More Cooperation between Finance & Procurement

All of these changes are discussed in a recent webinar I co-presented with Bob Cohen, VP Marketing at Basware, which can be viewed by clicking here.  And, here is a quick overview of the final 2 changes.

4.   Buyers & Suppliers Collaborate

The desire to bring buyers and suppliers closer to together is not a new concept, but it is one that is gaining more attention and momentum.  The potential benefits — from reducing transactional and administrative costs, to streamlining business processes — are just too great to ignore or put off for some unknown future date.  But, there are challenges that must be overcome, as each department has its unique set of requirements.  These can be overcome by focusing on better connections between buyers and suppliers, which then helps drive more timely access to better data.

The first step in the process is to improve the electronic connections between suppliers and buyers.  Moving away from paper-based, manual processes to electronic, automated processes serves to dramatically speed transaction times while reducing errors It also provides the opportunity to proactively use current data to drive better deals for your company.  Timely access to current data will help in setting better terms, more advantageous payment schedules, the ability to leverage product delivery issues (i.e. shipment is delayed, so payment should also be delayed), or to best determine payment timing strategies.  This all will help improve cash flow and streamline business processes for added cost savings.

5.   More Cooperation between Finance & Procurement

Improving the working relationships between finance and procurement is another area of potential organizational benefits, and one we predict is already in play.  Considering the different perspectives and roles that Procurement, AP, Finance, and Suppliers play within the P2P cycle, the potential for departmental disconnects are great, making the benefits to gain in harmonizing the connections equally as significant.  Accounts Payable is in a unique position to be the key convergence point for Procurement, Finance and Suppliers.  Placed at the center of these three entities, AP has the opportunity to add great value to the overall organization.  For example, where procurement is focused on what is spent, AP has the data to know what is spent, and when it is delivered.  With AP at the center of these three entities, they are in a position to deliver critical, timely data to procurement enabling them to negotiate better terms, improve deliver and receipt of goods, etc.  In this scenario, AP takes on a much more strategic and indispensable role in achieving organizational goals.

This has been a very quick overview of what we see as critical changes coming to the AP environment. For a more in-depth discussion around these points, please download the webinar by clicking here.

We will be posting additional material on these topics over the next few months.  We welcome your thoughts about changes you see which will impact AP and Procurement.

 

divider image

Joint Webinar with Winshuttle Explores Automating Links from AR to AP

Wednesday, July 13th, 2011

Streams of dataLast month, Lavante teamed up with our partners at Winshuttle to offer a unique look at how our combined solution is able to automates a stream of recovered dollars back to your company’s bottom line. During the session, we focused on how our technology solutions work to streamline a company’s SAP financial recovery auditing processes, resulting in lowering transactional errors and credits with suppliers.

The webinar focused on the following:

    * Minimizing the impact and time required to access real-time SAP Financial data
    * Leveraging access into your supplier records to drive dollars back to your company’s bottom line
    * Improving the accuracy of financial data and supplier records in your ERP System
    * Using the Winshuttle/Lavante solution to self-fund the joint-installation of both technologies

Click here to see a short video with an overview of what we discussed in the session.

And, to view the webinar, please click here.

I’d love to hear your thoughts about the material presented.

divider image

Lavante Responds to Customer Data Security Concerns with SAS 70 Type II Certification

Monday, June 27th, 2011

Last week marked an exciting moment for Lavante when we announced our SAS 70 Type II certification, continuing our forward momentum in developing and applying technology advances that benefit our customers. Statement on Auditing Standards No. 70, commonly abbreviated as SAS 70, is an auditing standard issued by American Institute of Certified Public Accountants (AICPA).

Our SAS 70 certification began with identifying 27 key controls related to our software development and data access security processes. Those controls were then evaluated and tested by a third party audit firm over a period of six months to ensure sustained performance. We are proud to have passed these tests and achieve the certification.

Our commitment to going through this long and rather arduous process came directly from our customer. After listening to their concerns around data security and SaaS applications we felt it was a necessary step to take in order to assure them that we had the highest level of security for all data.

But the impact of this certification extends beyond our customers, out to the industry as a whole. There are two different ways for a company to demonstrate SAS 70 compliance – the first is to use a SAS 70-compliant data hosting center, the second is to certify internal controls and development processes.

While other service providers in our industry have relied on only the first type, using SAS 70-compliant data centers, we clearly heard from our customers that this just wasn’t good enough. They wanted further assurance that development controls were in place on all internal processes, validated through a third party, as SAS 70 does.

To fully answer these requirements, we not only met the data center SAS 70 requirement, but extended this to cover the critical internal part of the equation. I predict that other service providers in our industry will now go down this same road, and adopt similar certification of internal process controls. This will be have a positive impact on our industry, by providing customers with further peace of mind and assurances that their data is secure.

In the end, I firmly believe that the future of our industry will flow directly through technology, providing intuitive applications that empower and enable people and companies to do more with less. As Lavante has demonstrated, most recently with our statement audit patent approval, that we will continue to lead the way in innovation and deploying technology that provides the highest levels of security to our customers.

Please add your comments here about what you think are them most critical concerns around data security and SAS 70 certification.

divider image