Posts Tagged ‘Accounts Payable Software’

Maintaining Supplier Data and Information to Maximize ERP Systems and 1099 Reporting Compliance (Part 1)

Monday, July 12th, 2010

Supplier information is integral to optimizing your relationships with your suppliers and for maximizing the value from your ERP system and other automated solutions.  Used correctly, a well kept supplier master data file is a strategic asset that can be leveraged into time savings, resource savings and dollars to your company’s bottom line. 

The biggest challenge to maintaining the quality of your supplier data is its near immediate decay after being recorded.  Suppliers constantly undergo mergers, purges, acquisitions and employee churn that challenge the integrity of their data.  Dun & Bradstreet (D&B) reports its database of businesses experiences annual changes of 20% for addresses, 17% for business names, and 18% for phone numbers underscoring how quickly and frequently supplier data decays.  ERP systems perform some data quality measures at the time a supplier is set up, but they do little to preserve the integrity of the data over time.  ERP systems are reliant on quality data, but they do not ensure it.

Allowing your supplier data to decay over time is very costly to your enterprise. Inaccurate data delays implementation of ERP systems and other automated solutions and can prevent those solutions from achieving their optimal ROI, effectiveness or their value over time.  Failure to identify overlaps or relationships within your supplier population can lead to missed volume discounts or rebates as well as an increase of duplicate payments by up to 300%.  Poor supplier data quality is also very costly in terms of lost efficiency and time.  Bad addresses alone can lead to miss-sent shipments and checks.  Quality supplier data is also vital to stay in compliance with various external regulations and internal controls.  Failure to achieve this compliance can be both disruptive and very costly while causing great exposure and risk.

Collection and management of supplier data is more important now than ever.  New 1099 tax legislation included in the funding provisions of the Patient Protection & Affordable Care Act (March 2010) requires companies to collect valid Tax Identification Numbers (TINs) on a much larger scale than pre-legislation levels.  Today most companies are expected to perform 1099 reporting for less than 10% of their supplier population. When the new law takes effect, companies can expect reporting levels to rise above 90%.  Companies will need to implement new policies and potentially even new systems to manage supplier information more accurately in pursuit of staying in compliance.

The question arises: How are you going to ensure the ongoing quality of supplier information to achieve optimal project ROI and on-going efficiency while maintaining compliance with controls and regulations? 

Check back for part two.

Free Webinar on 1099 Reporting Changes (from 2010 health care bill)

Wednesday, June 16th, 2010

Download the “New 1099 Tax Laws” Webinar for free!

We are still celebrating a huge success surrounding last Friday’s webinar.  With very limited outreach efforts, we overbooked the capacity of our web cast provider and we retained all attendees for the entire event.  Anyone well rehearsed in presenting webinars will acknowledge bth of these data points as huge feats!

Sherry DePew conducted and expert walk-thru of the new 1o99 laws which will dictate the future of 1099 reporting for companies (of all sizes) for the next several years.  The new laws will increase workloads, staffing requirements and exposure to significant non-compliance fines.  Sherry outlined a very realistic plan for getting all the facts and for getting prepared.

We are scheduling many more webinar events about similar and related topics soon.  Please notify us at info@lavante.com to get on our distribution list.

We would love to hear any comments or questions whether you were able to attend of not and we are offering a free video replay of the webinar by clicking on the tile below.

Webinar

The Summary of the 1099 Reporting and Tax Legislation changes

Tuesday, June 1st, 2010

The Summary of the Tax Legislation changes

Section 6041 of the Internal Revenue Code outlines 1099 reporting requirements.  The Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act includes an Amendment to Section 6041 which now requires 1099 reporting for any payments aggregating $600 to a supplier per year

The new amendment will now create requirements for reporting for:

  • All for-profit corporations (excluding tax-exempt corporations)
  • Payments made for Property (goods, merchandise, supplies, raw materials, equipment, etc.)

Companies will be required to submit accurate TIN information or face monetary penalties

The provision in the health care law is aimed to reduce the gap between income that individuals and businesses make and the federal taxes they pay, which the Government Accountability Office estimates is $345 billion

The Wall Street Journal says Congress hopes the new 1099 provision will collect $17 billion more in federal taxes and fees.

What has been changed? (more…)

Dynamic Discounting

Tuesday, May 18th, 2010

In my very unscientific research I have come to discover that Dynamic Discounting is all the rage, but that doesn’t exactly mean people are doing it.  During the “Changing Role of AP/AR” panel discussion at last Wednesday’s Masters Session a number of the panelists and and brave souls from the audience spoke very openly about how they are not really slaying this dragon… yet. 

When one panelist asked aloud if the room was engaging successfully in the practice only about 3 hands when up all the way…  there were one or two of those “half-up-but-not-really hands.”  I will not call anyone out but among the firms successfully using dynamic discounting were two large fortune 50 stalwarts.  Even they had to admit that they targeted vendors were of a select group and that procurement was still very much debating if they should negotiate longer terms and stay away from the early pay discounts.

Just thought I would shed a little light for those in the crowd that think they missed this train.  The conclusion:  People LOVE the idea of a successful dynamic discounting program and this topic has major buzz, but like most things… not many people can really sustain the practice and it remains in “when-I-have-time-to-get-around-to-it” limbo.

Please comment if you have plans to make this practice work internally or if you have input on the topic.  Would love to get more data on this.

IAPP FUSION Product Launch

Wednesday, May 12th, 2010

Lavante CEO, Joe  Flynn successfully got Lavante Connect kick-started in front of the “IAPP Emerging Technology Tour” in the FUSION 2010 exhibit hall on Tuesday Morning filled with approximately 1600 financial professionals.  Earliest reactions have been fantastic and FUSION attendees have been flooding the booth the review a demonstration of the new products and platform.

Sherry DePew followed  Joe’s lead with a standing room only workshop where she discussed portals and demonstrated our product. She was held after her session by attendees with lingering question for about thirty minutes.

This is a game changer!  Proud of the new developments and proud to be a Lavantine!

Supplier Information Management (SIM)

Thursday, April 29th, 2010

A week ago I blogged the answer to some questions about a recent press release regarding our Q1 growth… in the blog I let slip a teaser about a new product…  after a few more queries…  I will reveal the following:

Powered by the underlying Lavante ConnectTM platform which is hands down, the premier tool for driving communication compliance across a supplier population of any size, Lavante has unified their development team of 13souls under one game changing goal: Supplier Information Management (SIM)

This is not what you have read about anywhere else, this is not vaporware, this is not one way.  This is the soup and the nuts.  This is hard ROI…  You get both the industry leading recoveries and the supplier information together.  Pays… for… itself…

This is connection to all suppliers… for all of your departments with workflow and automation and two way communication with the click of a mouse.  This is data and docs and proactive updating based on your needs and controls.  This is much more than you have seen anywhere else but you need to hold on for a few more days…

Blast off is on May 11th in Dallas.

Recovery Auditing Misconception #4

Wednesday, April 28th, 2010

Recovery Auditing Misconception #4:   I don’t have the time or resources to support this process

The Short Answer:

It takes very little of your time or resources to support a Lavante recovery audit.  All you need do is send a basic vendor file and dedicate one employee for typically an hour per week.

How is this possible?

To begin an audit: Lavante can get started working from a data file that in many instances requires less than an hour for clients to generate. AP typically can create the data file Lavante needs and client IT does not need to get involved.  This is all that’s required for a full recovery audit.

To support an ongoing audit: Clients working with Lavante typically require less than one hour per week to receive and upload verified claims and vendor file updates into their system. No onsite Lavante personnel are ever needed to support the effort.

Clients who wish to save additional time can work with their Lavante Account Manager to integrate claims directly into their ERP system.  Lavante will automatically match claims against an internal credit listing, thus pre-checking the credits and enabling clients to upload credits directly as ledger entries with no manual intervention.

Lavante InSight

For companies concerned about the time commitment or skeptical of the potential benefits of performing a recovery audit, Lavante offers a way for clients to test and sample the service before fully engaging. 

Lavante InSight™ gives you a view of the recovery audit you might have. It generates an estimate of the likely cash recoveries and vendor updates you will receive if you choose to engage in a Lavante Strategic Recovery audit. Utilizing your master vendor file, InSight leverages Lavante’s extensive database of historical audit detail, a proprietary, on-demand software application and our Supplier Network of over two million companies to develop a comprehensive vendor and recovery analysis. InSight previews potential cash recoveries, duplicate and related vendors, recovery projections over time, vendor updates, and more.

Vendor Credit Recovery

Saturday, April 24th, 2010

Vendor credit benchmarking from the front lines.

Every industry has its fair share of reports, surveys, data points, and sound bites.  The Profit Recovery industry is no different.  In the last few years we have performed quite a bit of analysis and benchmarking to uncovered some compelling data  about recovering credits from your vendors and suppliers.

From a survey of over 100 clients and prospects we have discovered that most traditional recovery providers sample only the top 5-20% of your vendor population when reviewing vendor-side credits?  Our survey elaborates (based on feed back from AP professionals) that without the aid of a communication compliance engine (Lavante is the only firm with such an app.)  traditional statement audit reviews, whether they are done by third party firms or by internal efforts simply cannot support indepth vendor penetration with manual methods and cap out at 20%. 

Our vendor credit recovery benchmarking demonstrates that 61% of vendor credit opportunity resides in the lower 80% of your vendor file.  To put it another way, traditional manual methods, will find, at most, 39% of credits available to you.

Another fact you may not be aware of is that 37% of vendor-side claims come from product returns.  This category is by far the largest we are tracking.  And it has huge implications not only to the existing process you have for returns transactions, but also on where your profit recovery audits should focus.  In contrast, we’ve found that only 9% of vendor-side claims are the result of duplicate payments.  Keep in mind that hese numbers vary depending on industry.   

Some other interesting metrics indicate that the average claim amount from a vendor credit recovery review is $817.  (with a range of about $400-$1200)  We have also discovered that the actual recovery potential for vendor credit recovery is $600,000 -$900,000 per $1Billion in addressable spend volume. Although we are the only recovery provider to project recoveries below the typical industry benchmark ($1M per $1B in spend) we feel confident that this carefully calculated metric passes both the scientific test and a gut test as well.  When we approach new prospects and we explain that depending on their industry they stand to recovery within this range that data is always well received based on what they have actually seen from other firms and not what they have been promised.

Based on our discoveries, we have also determined that for every month you do not perform an in depth automated vendor credit review you risk  losing $63,000 per billion dollars of spend with no chance of recovering it.  While $63,000 may not be a huge amount for you, if you spend multiple billions of dollars, and delay just a quarter’s time, that $63,000 figure becomes a large sum of money.

If you have any more questions about our benchmarking survey please join the conversation…

Our Latest News: Recovery Audit Technology Leader Lavante Continues Record Growth

Saturday, April 24th, 2010

On Wednesday, we released a straight forward news story about our Q1 success: Recovery Audit Technology Leader Lavante Continues Record Growth.   The story reported that we are growing quickly and that we are moving to a new larger facilty in San Jose.  The story was very direct and did not elaborate on too many details.   I was suprised by a volume of incoming emails and calls asking for more details.  On Wednesday alone I heard from three clients and three reporter/analysts.  More emails and calls continue to make there way in… 

I’d like to elaborate a little bit more on the story for the Lavante watchers in the audience.   Our new grade A facility is in the Santa Teresa area of San Jose and the property manger tells me it is over 26,000 square feet!  I do not want to risk a blister trying to walk through and measure it myself.  We plan to have our entire operation moved over in a couple months, but we are in the middle of three major trade events in the next month and we are rolling out a brand new product in three weeks so some of us are having a hard time packing our boxes.  (uh-oh… more phone call and emails from that “new product” teaser I am sure)

Regarding new business… how do I put this?  As the articles inicates, Q1 was a record quarter, but we’ve nearly already beat it in April alone.  Yes you read that correctly.  Clients are closing more quickly and they are growing larger in size…  In 2010 we have begun workng with three of the largest private companies in the U.S. and our new public clients are averaging a Fortune rating of F297.

I hope that answers any questions, but I am always available to discuss further.

Recovery Auditing Misconception #3 of 4

Friday, April 23rd, 2010

Recovery Auditing Misconception #3:  Profit Recovery is not a current Priority and I can afford to wait. 

The Short Answer

You may not be aware of it, but credits age and disappear over time. Once gone, they can’t be recovered. Our results show that delaying Lavante’s review could cost your company $62,500 per month for every billion dollars of your annualized spend. That’s for every month you delay. 

Why?

Lavante’s core product focuses on the AR balances of your vendors and discovers credits that you didn’t even know existed.  However, vendors are constantly reconciling and cleaning their AR records.  Unapplied credits have a “shelf-life:” as they age and go unclaimed, they’re applied by the vendor to offset unrelated disputed invoices or unearned discounts, or eventually written-off.  Unlike client AP records, there often isn’t a historic database that preserves ledger entries after they have been removed.  Thus, if a vendor removes a credit from their AR record, then it’s usually lost with no possibility of recovery. 

Lavante’s exhaustive benchmarking metrics point to a number of reasons why it is vital to begin the review immediately. 

  • Based on over a million data points, Lavante research suggests that after an open credit has aged over 90 days, you have less than a 20% chance of recovering that credit without third party intervention.  This subset of credits that age beyond 90 days accounts for potentially millions of dollars on an annual basis and should be part of your existing standards for managing working capital.
  • Lavante recovers for clients a consistent range of between $600,000 and $900,000 per every billion dollars in addressable spend. If not audited, this is the amount lost annually (see the figure below) due to vendor aging activity. This recovery history suggests that every month you delay reviewing these dynamic vendor records, you stand to lose $63,000 per billion dollars you spend (1/12th or 8% of your potential annual recovery opportunity).