Posts By Sherry DePew

How One Healthcare Provider Applied Lavante to Clean Up Vendor File and Drive Recovery Dollars – Recapping a Recent Industry Conference Session

Tuesday, February 7th, 2012

Lavante Recovery helps recover dollars for the health care industryLast month at the IFO’s HPAS conference I had the pleasure of co-presenting a session with Jennifer Barnett, former AP Manager of Summa Health and current AP Manager for Walmart Foundation.  The session, entitled Moving Beyond Manual Processes to Improve AP Efficiencies, focused on how while at Summa Health, Jennifer had worked to move away from manual recovery and vendor master file cleansing processes to Lavante’s automated solution.

We began the discussion with a review of the challenge health care providers face in keeping the vendor master files up-to-date. Not only are suppliers constantly changing, but as with any company, there is a constant shifting of individual contacts at each supplier.  Jennifer noted that at Summa Health System the vendor master file was split between AP and Supply Chain. When the decision was made to merge all files together, they looked at how to best perform this function and update records at the same time.

As Jennifer recalled: “We met Lavante at IFO’s Fusion conference, and while we weren’t looking for a recovery provider at the time, when I saw that the recovery process included vendor data file cleansing, I knew we needed to learn more.  After returning from Fusion, we worked with Lavante to do a cost comparison between using the Lavante Recovery solution and using contractors to manually go through our master vendor records, and there was just no real comparison.”

As Jennifer and her team had just concluded a 3-month recovery audit with a traditional recovery service, spending three months on-site combing through hundreds of boxes of historic invoices, physically touching 95% of all payables, she didn’t expect Lavante to find any credits. “I was astonished at the immediate credits that Lavante was able to uncover. They found credits that the other service never found, in spite of the fact that they had physically gone through all of our payable records for the previous 7 years. Lavante found sizable recovery dollars from as far back as five years ago.”

Lavante works with many health care providers and finds that not only can we find credit dollars that traditional firms will miss, but we can easily identify root causes for these credits. Because Lavante Recovery assigns a “type” to each credit identified by the supplier, our clients can quickly identify problem areas.

Jennifer brought up several examples of how Lavante was able to identify process improvement areas. The first related to rebates. Lavante was able to find rebates that they simply never knew were out there. Once identified, Jennifer’s team was able to work with the supplier to recover dollars due them from years back. Another example focused on identifying that many invoices were paid without the proper discounts being applied. “These both represented what would have been missed money that our organization would never have recovered without Lavante’s automated recovery solution,” Jennifer noted.

Returning to Jennifer’s original issue – vendor master file cleansing – Jennifer recalled that Summa took a phased approach to deploying Lavante, bringing in separate hospitals one at a time. After the first year, over 80% of its vendors had been updated, a rate that continued to improve.  And, because this update process is ongoing, they don’t need to do an end-of-the-year vendor master file update process. It’s always ready.

I thoroughly enjoyed working with Jennifer at the conference! It was good to hear more about how Lavante has made a  difference at Summa Health Systems.

The session will be repeated as a live webinar later next month, so stay tuned for that announcement.

divider image

Benefiting from a Prescription for Clean Data: A Case Study

Tuesday, January 24th, 2012

A recent case study developed by Spend Matters details  how a North American and global procurement organization for a top five pharmaceutical company applied a defined exercise and solution implementation from Lavante to discover where it had excess risk exposure, lack of policy compliance, overpayments and other cost driving issues. The procurement organization, which primarily focused on order-to-cash, procure-to-pay, credit and collections was ultimately able to trace all of its challenges in these areas back to weak or missing vendor data.

As the case study details, the company already had some of its vendor data under active management, but many vendor data points required enhanced management. Critical data with inaccuracies included:  remit-to addresses, parent child connections, duplicate vendor entries and incomplete fields including TIN, email and fax numbers.

If the organization had embarked on its data cleansing efforts internally, the benefits would not have cost-justified the task. As such, it decided to work with an external partner. After evaluating a number of providers, this pharmaceutical company selected Lavante based on the power of its underlying technology and the portal it offers to access it. Lavante also offered a breadth of coverage to reach the majority of the pharmaceutical company’s vendors rather than just the top 10-20% of its vendors.

The company implemented the change process by centralizing data quality through one common channel in order to ensure accurate books. To achieve this, the solution was integrated with the pharmaceutical company’s vendor outreach and registration process through four key components: validation, updates, augmentation and de-duplication to primarily find duplicate payments.

To read more about this process, download the full case study by clicking here.
It clearly demonstrates how this global pharmaceutical company was able to recover $5MM in credit opportunities based on a total spend of $10 billion. In order to have the same EPS impact, the organization estimated they would have needed to generate between $50MM and $100MM in new sales.

An underlying platform for credit recovery proved to be the key success factor. Previous, largely manual consultant-led activities focused on only top vendors and their “statement reviews” and led to a lower recovery rate. In contrast, the Lavante platform cast a wider net, and this broader reach resulted in additional recovery opportunities that had been previously overlooked. This was critical for this pharmaceutical company as the top 10-20% of vendors were already “over-farmed” and the next tier down was where the most significant potential for recovery was found.

divider image

Inaccurate Vendor Data Impacts Multiple Departments and Can Jeopardize Critical Corporate Initiatives

Tuesday, January 3rd, 2012

Vendor File Cleansing Impacts Multiple Enterprise DepartmentsWithout current, accurate vendor data, a long list of corporate initiatives can be rendered unmanageable or even impossible to execute. From procure-to-pay, supplier diversity and tax compliance to strategic sourcing and social responsibility, supplier data touches multiple processes and can have a dramatic impact on priorities throughout an organization.

In my professional career, first as Director of Global Shared Services for Boise Cascade, and most recently as VP Account Management at Lavante, I’ve experienced some real world examples that highlight how critical accurate vendor data is to any organization.

Here are several examples:

      When introducing new terms and conditions, a company had to send a letter to all vendors updating them of the changes; unfortunately, a staggering 80% of the letters were returned due to bad information.

 

      At another organization, increased banking charges were addressed by bringing remittance advice routing in-house. The most expensive and time consuming part of the project was acquiring correct email and fax numbers, which took inordinate amounts of time and money.

 

      After purchasing a comprehensive e-invoicing solution, one company took more than two years to clean up their vendor information so they could take full advantage of the new technology, resulting in much delayed ROI for the project.

 

      A group of advertisers placing orders with various media companies started requiring diversity information reports. In order to prevent a significant drop in revenue from these advertisers, one media company had to immediately engage their 30,000 vendors and rapidly find a means of collecting basic supplier diversity information to avoid losing business.

 

      As a check-fraud-prevention measure, one organization required all suppliers to receive ACH/EFT payments. This requirement cost untold dollars and the company took more than a year trying to contact their suppliers about the policy change due to incorrect, missing and out-of-data supplier contact information.

Because bad data can trickle down your supply chain, it is important to solve issues upstream before the impact becomes contagious. A lack of good vendor data can have a dramatic impact on your organization – from exposure to vendors with credit issues, to reliance on proprietary suppliers for critical components, to the more pedestrian (yet costly) issues that can arise from using vendors not in compliance with your terms and policies.

Good data housekeeping is not only a best practice, it can have a long term positive effect on your company’s overall performance across every department.

To read more about the impact of bad supplier data, take a look at a recent Lavante webinar, hosted with Jason Busch of Spend Matters.  You can also find out more about how Lavante Recovery helps to not only speed dollars to your bottom line, but also automatically handles vendor file cleansing.  Click here to find out more.

divider image

Global Cruise Line Uses Lavante to Maximize Recovery Efforts

Thursday, November 3rd, 2011

As part of a larger report published by PayStream advisors earlier this year, PayStream also interviewed a Lavante customer to verify the comprehensive statement audit best practice approach covered in the paper. The findings of this interview are now available, which validates Lavante’s approach to applying technology to help our clients drive a continuous stream of credits to their bottom line, and uncover the root cause of trouble areas so AP departments can work with their counterparts throughout the P2P Process to take quick corrective actions.

We were happy to see that our recovery process was clearly differentiated from both internal review and traditional, manual audit processes. Before bringing Lavante in for a trial, the global cruise line had used in-house processes to track duplicate payments and unclaimed credits before trying two different traditional AP recovery audit firms. The later proved to be too invasive with too few results, and they decided to try Lavante with a small scope.

Based on the results of this smaller project, after a short time the audit scope was expanded to include more recent credits – from a initial 180 days down to 120 days old, and now working on 90 days. This “rolling” time frame is an important part of the statement audit process, as it gives the client’s internal AP process to catch many of the credits. We sit in the background as a safety net, continuously connecting with the company’s suppliers to ensure that credits on these older statements are caught. And, Lavante delivers these credits via our online web portal on a weekly basis.

As the manager of Cash Disbursements stated:

“[Lavante’s] job is to get out there and identify where people owe us money. They let us get this money faster and equally as important, quickly recognize potential errors. They are helping us collect with is due to us and most likely, a lot of this would be missed.”

To read the entire case study, please click here. And, to read the larger white paper which outlines the best practices for a comprehensive statement audit, click here.

divider image

Lavante Panel Prompts Lively Discussion Centered on Statement Audits & Supplier Portals at the IFO Toronto Conference

Monday, September 26th, 2011

Lavante presents at industry conference
Earlier this month it was my pleasure to moderate a very lively and insightful panel at the Institute of Financial Operations’ conference in Toronto, Canada. Lavante hosted the panel discussion, bringing together leaders from the AP community representing The Four Seasons Hotels & Resorts, Lafarge North America, RIM, and Telus. Panelists focused on Transforming AP through Technology & Automation, with two topics spurring considerable attention and discussion:

Statement Audits: There was considerable interest in the presentation by one panelist who presented how automating the statement audit process using Lavante Recovery has delivered a steady stream of credit recoveries, beyond what was anticipated – in the first year over 1% of auditable spend was recovered. He covered how his company had moved from an inherited manual/paper based system to Lavante’s automated, web-based solution, which has provided seamless access to results through the online web portal. Lavante’s ability to automatically connect to and audit the breadth of suppliers vs. a smaller subset that a traditional recovery process would target, had an added benefit of improving communications and the overall relationship with vendors.

This focus on the importance of supplier relationships spilled over into the next hot topic the panel uncovered:

Supplier Management Portal: The need for an easy, transparent way to connect with suppliers and improve the supplier service function was another hot discussion topic. There were several presentations focused on this topic. One presenter focused on the process now underway to implement a vendor portal to the organization, leading with the findings that internal development of a supplier management portal would be cost prohibitive. Important issues in selecting a vendor were identified as: data integrity, eliminating duplicate vendors, and maintaining an accurate active vendor file. Ease of use, workflow approvals, and an increased turn-around time for approvals were also important elements cited. Questions about what incentives would drive vendors to join the network centered on the benefits vendors would enjoy and the possibilities of customizing the approaches for different types of providers.

I applaud the conference organizers (this was the first IFO conference in Toronto) in including this along with many other technology-oriented sessions at the event. Thank you to all of the panelists and audience members for a thought-provoking session. And, please check our website for more information about Lavante Recovery.

divider image

Creative Credits – Ways Suppliers Use Your Credits in Unusual Ways to Their Benefit

Wednesday, September 7th, 2011

Does your company have a policy against paying finance charges?  Do you know if suppliers apply credits to unrelated invoices?  Unless you are using a technology-driven statement audit recovery process, chances are high that both of these instances are happening out of sight and beyond your control.  Even if you have a traditional AP audit project in place, unless you are performing a deep-dive across the breadth of your supplier spend, I can guarantee that you are losing money to what I call creative credit application.

I base this on my 15 years experience as Director, Shared Accounting Services for Boise Cascade, and most recently four years as VP of Account Management at Lavante.  In both roles, I’ve learned the critical role that a comprehensive statement audit plays in assuring that you have full transparency into all credits due your company – from vendors representing the highest to the lowest spend.

Here are a few examples of the creative ways suppliers can use your company credits to their own advantage.

Example #1:  In the first example, a supplier took a portion of a larger credit, $392.83, and rather than returning the entire amount to the company, notes on the credit verification form that some of the funds were applied to cover an “outstanding finance charge. “  Not only is paying finance charges against that company’s policies, applying funds to an outstanding invoice poses other problems for AP.  If it is a real liability by that company, the PO and receipt will continue to accrue on a monthly basis if no invoice is presented.

Without a comprehensive statement audit, this creative credit application would have been missed.  And while $392.88 may seem like an insignificant amount, multiply this by thousands of other potential invoices, and these missed costs add up.

Here, the supplier applies a known credit to cover finance charges.


 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Example # 2:  Another instance where you are unaware of how suppliers are using credits involves using a known credit to pay a completely unrelated, and often disputed, invoice.  The typical scenario is when a credit is identified by the supplier and there is an unpaid invoice outstanding.  The supplier simply applies the credit to that invoice rather than refunding the dollars back to the company.  This second examples shows a supplier has done just that.  Applied a portion of a credit to another invoice, which in this case, was in dispute.

This credit verification shows that the supplier has applied to cover an unrelated invoice.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

In both of these examples, it is highly unlikely that a traditional AP audit would find these credit anomalies, and the monies would be lost to the company.  Using a comprehensive statement audit process, which focuses on vendor statements rather than internal AP records, and that looks across the breadth of a company’s supplier base, is the only way to find many hidden credits which either go unresolved or applied to the benefit of the supplier.

For more information on how statement audits work, download the white paper, Statement Audits: An Untapped Source of Dollars for Your Company.

divider image

IAPP Fusion 2011 Delivered AP Thought Leadership – From 1099 Reporting and Statement Audit Best Practices to Innovative Technology and Team Building

Thursday, May 19th, 2011

This year’s Fusion (May 8-11 in Orlando, FL) began with the announcement of the association’s name change from IAPP to the Institute of Financial Operations (IFO) – which was exciting news for everyone present at the conference. The conference then fulfilled on its promise to present thought-provoking sessions along with ample opportunity to network with AP and Shared Services professionals.

Here are some themes I heard rise to the surface throughout the four-day event:

    Tax & Compliance Issues: Numerous sessions and discussions were devoted to this topic. Attendees were looking not only for more understanding about regulations, but specific details on how to move from non-compliance to compliance. Two recurring examples were the changing landscape around the 1099 reporting laws and foreign citizen reporting.

    Automated, Comprehensive Statement Audits: PayStream Advisors & Lavante held a joint session presenting new research on Statement Audits as a Best Practice in Recovery Auditing, focused on the difference between traditional AP recovery audits and dedicated statement audits. The audience expressed great interest in innovative technology for statement auditing, as well as the resulting increased recovery dollars and vendor updates. Lavante’s booth was constantly filled with prospects wanting to learn more about our statement audit technology.

    Selecting & Deploying Innovative Technology: Not only were there sessions devoted to this subject, but considerable activity on the exhibit floor. I met with several Lavante customers attending the conference specifically to look for technology to help with invoicing and supplier management. The high interest in this topic was clearly demonstrated when the joint session led by Basware & Lavante, The Future of Accounts Payable: Improve Data, Improve Processes, Discover Technology had the highest attendance of any conference session (over 100, standing room only).

    Building a Strong, Motivated Team: Many sessions and considerable “buzz” was devoted to how to motivate and build a strong, successful AP team. I saw sessions and witnessed many hallway conversations that focused on cost-effective ways to reward and recognize internal staff in order to build the best, most productive team possible.

These are just some of the main themes that I picked up at the conference. I welcome feedback from others attending the conference about great sessions or themes you saw emerging.

divider image

PayStream Advisors Present Five Best Practice Steps for a Successful Statement Audit Process

Wednesday, March 23rd, 2011

Large enterprise accounts payable organizations manage millions of payments to thousands of vendors each year. Business changes including mergers and acquisitions, consolidation, and centralization, as well as new systems and automation mean that 100 percent payment accuracy is nearly impossible – even for AP organizations with the strongest controls. To identify the highest percentage of anomalies and recover the most dollars, it is necessary to investigate both a company’s internal AP data and processes, as well as its suppliers’ AR data and processes.

A statement audit is the practice of reviewing the AR accounting records of a company’s suppliers for un-offset credits. A comprehensive statement audit targets the breadth of a company’s supplier population to request and analyze AR data which delivers significantly higher statement claims than the traditional recovery auditing approaches. Implementing a comprehensive statement audit means managing communication and outreach with mass volumes of suppliers and requires an automated solution to handle the supplier data, orchestrate the outreach, and collect and manage incoming information from this high number of suppliers.

The following is best practice guideline based on research conducted by PayStream Advisors, and included in the recent industry white paper, Statement Audits: An Untapped Source of Dollars For Your Company. These steps illustrate how to implement the most successful statement audit process at your company and drive more recovery dollars to your bottom line:

    1. Start with good supplier data: In order to communicate with suppliers, the first step is ensuring you have the right data and communication preferences. Supplier data deteriorates quickly, so it’s no small feat to keep your data clean and up-to-date. For an effective statement audit, you need a system that will manage supplier data, cleanse and identify issues, enrich with external data, and ensure contact information and communication preferences are up-to-date at all times.
    2. Drive supplier compliance across multiple communication channels: Supplier compliance is an ongoing process; contacting supplier just once is not enough. The statement audit process is analogous to collecting past due balances – outreach statistics show that multiple touches are required to drive maximum compliance. Using an automated, pro-active, multi-channel approach to drive compliance is critical to a statement audit.
    3. Use technology to capture and validate supplier statements: With the mass volume of outreaches, statements and supporting documents, and verifications involved in a statement audit, technology is essential to tracking and managing the process. Technology can ensure there is an easy way to track, manage, analyze and verify information sent to and received from your suppliers.
    4. Proactively identify accounting anomalies and root causes: Visibility into transactions and credits across your supplier base enables you to identify accounting anomalies that occur after a transaction is settled. For example, expired products that are returned for credit after a three-way match will be caught by a statement audit.
    5. View statement auditing as an ongoing process, not a project: Transactional errors with suppliers occur every day. A statement audit helps you find anomalies that your organization does not resolve in the first 120 days. Identifying and resolving issues on an ongoing basis, vs on an annual or biannual basis helps you to maintain better processes and uncovers more money left with your suppliers. A rolling four month statement audit is a best practice.

Please add your ideas about how statement audits currently work at your company, and your thoughts about these best practice steps. And, be sure to subscribe to The HUB for automated alerts when new content has been posted.

divider image

Understanding the 1099-K Reporting Changes Now in Effect

Thursday, February 10th, 2011

Last week, I introduced six initiatives AP and Shared Services could implement to drive organizational efficiencies in 2011. This week, I’d like to focus on the 1099-K reporting changes that went into effect in January of this year.

This change was part of the Housing Assistance Tax Act of July, 2008. It was better known for providing credits to first-time home buyers, but it also created the new 1099-K tax form, which shifts the 1099 reporting for companies that use credit cards to pay suppliers. Under this new ruling, starting in 2011, all financial institutions that process credit or debit card payments will be responsible for sending the 1099 documentation of that year’s transactions to both their clients and the IRS. Before this ruling, the company that received the funds was required to handle the reporting.

The ruling will only impact merchants that have over 200 payments that total over $20,000, but it will have enormous impact on companies of all sizes.

First, AP departments that use automated systems to populate spend files and create 1099 reports will need to remove those transactions that now fall under the responsibility of the third-party funding agent.

Second, it will increase the 1099 reporting responsibilities of all institutions that act as a funding agent for another company. This would include both financial services companies (banks, credit card companies, etc.) as well as outsourced AP companies. As of January 31, 2011, these third party companies will be responsible for collecting W9s and producing the 1099 reports next year.

The reasons behind these changes actually make a lot of sense. It is intended to shift the task of producing 1099 reports to the institutions that actually own the relationship with the entity that makes the payment. In the case of a credit card, the financial services company holds the cardholder information, not the merchant, which is necessary to obtain accurate reporting information.

For a deeper discussion about how to prepare for the impact of 1099 reporting laws, visit the Lavante 1099 resource center.

divider image

TAKE THE INITIATIVE TO DRIVE AP AND SHARED SERVICE ORGANIZATIONAL EFFICIENCIES IN 2011

Thursday, February 3rd, 2011

We’d like to devote this blog to presenting some ideas and actions that AP and Shared Services can pro-actively put in place this year to improve operational and budget efficiencies. I welcome your thoughts on this subject, along with methods or action plans that you will take this year to improve your department’s organization and processes.

  1. Make sure to use the latest technology, and that you utilize all of the functionality to gain the maximum benefits from your investment.
  2. Continuously check to be sure your costs are as low or lower than the competition, which is likely outsourcing.
  3. Review how your department is taking discounts and timing payments to realize the greatest advantage of interest rates in relation to cash flow.
  4. Given the change in financial markets, protecting the institution’s financial rating is increasingly important. Don’t let late payments downgrade your company’s financial rating, which could then increase interest rates. Work within the term limits as suggested above, but make sure you stay current!
  5. Take advantage of every non-capital expenditure that can bring dollars back into the organization. One example of this would be recovery audit processes. If you are using a recovery service, whether it is primary or secondary, make sure that it is paying more than it is costing in terms of resources.
  6. Stay current on changes in the laws that could impact your processes, especially the 1099 reporting changes. Begin working now (if you haven’t already done so), to develop a realistic project plan that will let your company comply with the new regulations.


Here are a few additional thoughts on the looking at technology for AP & Shared Services.

When looking at bringing on new technology solutions, look for ways that it can give you fast, near real-time visibility into root-cause analysis. This means utilizing on-demand solutions that can continuously report on processes as opposed to manual, more project-based engagements. In recovery, this would mean that you have immediate visibility into issues surrounding credits. This gives you two distinct advantages; first you take the credit faster, and secondly, you have can take remedial actions to correct any problems related to the credits.

Another suggestion is whenever possible, leverage technology benefits across multiple areas. For example, when collecting TIN information, see if you can obtain up-dated supplier contact information, updated risk mitigation information, parent/sub reporting, etc. Look at ways the technology can add multiple levels of value throughout your organization.

I’ll continue next week with more discussion around the two 1099 reporting changes. In the meantime, here is a link to several webinars we presented last year that deal with preparing for the impact of these changes.

divider image