Posts from July, 2012

“Vendor Profiling” – Not a Best Practice for Statement Audit Providers

Wednesday, July 18th, 2012

Recently, we have heard the term “profiling” used most often in association with controversy.  It has become a new word to describe the age-old desire to put people or objects in nice, neat buckets or categories while ignoring the reality that life just isn’t that simple.  The attempt to extrapolate perceived qualities across an entire group has never worked out very well in practice.

In the finance and AP area the term is now being used by some Statement Audit/Credit Recovery service providers claiming to have determined how to “profile” a client’s suppliers in order to determine which of them are likely to have the most credit transaction activity.  They insist that this supplier profiling process produces a group that can be targeted for a “pat-down” in their search for these credits.  The service providers would like you to think that this technique allows them to successfully obtain the vast majority of credits available.  Furthermore, that their very labor-intensive methods of contacting the remaining suppliers and then getting and reviewing the statements are completely unrelated to this highly selective profiling approach.  That is a convenient, but unsubstantiated, argument.

Our experience at Lavante has shown a much different story — that  while the top 20% of suppliers by spend do generate a disproportionately large 40% of the credits, a full 60% of available credits are never addressed by a traditional, periodic statement audit approach because it never reaches the remainder.

In this one example from a large health care provider, a full 68% of the credits came from the lower 80% of vendor spend.

The truth is that there is no single formula to determine which of the myriad reasons for credit creation align with a certain supplier profile.  Furthermore, credits are issued by any and all of a client’s suppliers.

The Lavante approach is unique in attempting to reach all vendors — unless they are intentionally excluded — using an automated, patented process while setting a benchmark of achieving compliance by those that represent 95% of total spend.   We have found numerous credits yet on the books of many suppliers that have $0 in spend during our clients’ most recent reporting period.  Few profiling techniques would include these in their search.

Leveraging proprietary technology gives us the ability to automate a continuous connection process with suppliers to update vendor information and identify supplier hierarchies leading to the collection of current statements.  Because the Lavante Recovery+ solution tracks vendor compliance, it is easy to perform more effective follow-up with non-compliant suppliers that assure the highest compliance rates possible.  We are confident that Lavante finds many credits that have long since been offset and are no longer visible to old-school audit methods which leave substantial time-gaps between efforts.

There is no question that the statement audit process has evolved beyond its outdated origins as a one-time process conducted along with the traditional A/P recovery audit and needs to have separate best-practice attention as an automated, ongoing background solution.   We would be happy to show you how it all works. Contact me directly to schedule some time for a demo.

If you are interested in more information on how technology enables the statement audit process, be sure to attend the upcoming webinar, Automating the Recovery Process:  How Technology is a Best Practice in Recovery Audit on July 24 with Henry Ijams of Paystream Advisors.

 


 

Please Note:  Jeff Wiest recently joined Lavante as a Sr. Solutions Advisor.  Please click here to find out more about his extensive AP experience.

 

 

divider image

A Leading Healthcare Provider Recovers $300,000 in Lost Credits Thanks to a Lavante Recovery Process

Monday, July 16th, 2012

Earlier this year, Lavante Recovery+ recovered an over $300,000 credit for our client, a  leading healthcare provider.  The story of how this credit was identified and recovered is a testament to the effectiveness of an ongoing, continuous audit that leverages technology to update supplier contact details through an extensive supplier network all while providing real time visibility into the relevant supplier communications and audit details.

Here’s how it happened.  In late 2009, a statement was received from a vendor showing little activity and no credits.  A few months later, as a part of the periodic supplier statement refresh process, Lavante requested updated information from this vendor.  At first, the vendor did not respond and the credit, created only two months after the last statement was received at Lavante, went unnoticed.  Luckily for this healthcare provider, however, Lavante’s communications with the supplier didn’t stop there.  When subsequent automated requests went unanswered, they were followed up with phone calls to obtain updated information, a process which was accelerated because several key pieces of contact information (phone number and fax number) were updated automatically through Lavante Supplier Network™.  Once the statement was received from the supplier and processed through Lavante”s automated Fax to OCR technology, the credit was quickly identified.  Immediately, follow up began as Lavante’s experienced audit specialist went to work to contact the vendor and verify the claim.  In subsequent discussions with the vendor, she discovered that the credit was generated when the healthcare company cancelled an already paid-for project and the money was left on the books and overlooked.  The vendor told the auditor that they would be willing to issue a refund check to clear the item.  For nearly two and a half years, the vendor was just waiting for someone to claim this money and was glad when they were able to properly close the transaction.

Lavante Recovery+ shows the number of suppliers changed

Figure 1:  This graph shows the number of vendor details which have  been updated using the Lavante recovery process.
In this example, over 7,000 suppliers have been updated, which equals over 60% of the suppliers contacted.

Successful credit recoveries after communications between the buyer and the supplier have ceased depends on access to up-to-date supplier contact information.  This credit had been aging undetected for over two years, and without updated records that could drive successful outreach, this large credit could have eventually been lost forever.  Mary Schaeffer, Editor & Publisher of AP Now and Tomorrow, speaks to this danger in the whitepaper, The Case of the Disappearing Credits , in which she exposes the potential for companies to permanently lose vendor credits if an ongoing, comprehensive statement audit is not practiced.  The paper reinforces the lessons learned with this large credit recovery that a continuous recovery methodology is critical to a successful statement audit.  With such an effort, companies realize on-going dollars to the bottom line coupled with the reassurance that no vendor credit goes unnoticed and unclaimed.  Furthermore, it is critical that vendor outreach is part of the Accounts Payable process to ensure credits are identified accurately and on a timely basis.

Another part of this recovery process is giving the user full visibility into the audit process – in real time.  As shown in the Figure 2 below, the Lavante Recovery+ user had full access to all related documents, including the credit verification and check request forms, through an automated workflow interface.  The Lavante auditor was able to coordinate all efforts via this same portal, and the refund was delivered in less than 30 days after it was first identified.


Figure 2: Users can quickly review and process credits online through the Lavante Recovery+ application interface, which provides click-through access to all back-up documents.

Needless to say, the healthcare provider was delighted with the results, and saw yet another benefit from an ongoing recovery process instead of using more infrequent project-oriented audits.  They stated they would have been impressed with a $30,000 credit, but were absolutely amazed that a credit over ten times as large had gone undetected by normal AP controls and was quickly resolved by Lavante.

As Mary Schaeffer finds in The Case of the Disappearing Credits, “…an ongoing process means the maximum credit dollars can be recovered in a timely basis.”  The very real impact of a continuous recovery process detailed in this example reinforces the critical components a recovery solution must contain in order to drive this level of results, which include: including the ability to:

  • •    Perform ongoing outreach to the breadth of the supplier base;
  • •    Leverage an expansive supplier network;
  • •    Provide real-time access to the entire audit process through an on-demand web portal;
  • •    Include an experienced audit team that can see claims through to the end.

A more traditional audit project simply does not have the capability and software to execute this level of success.  Lavante’s process ensures statements are received, credits identified, and accurate results are delivered to customers on a regular basis.  I welcome your feedback about this process and learn more about how you are working to resolve unclaimed credits at your company.

______________

Added note.  Jeff recently joined Lavante as a Sr. Consultant, coming to Lavante after his position as Director of AP at Rite Aid.  Click here to learn more about Jeff’s experience in the AP industry.


 

 

divider image

Lavante Recognizes AP Thought Leaders at Fusion 2012

Monday, July 9th, 2012

For those of you who were able to attend the IFO Fusion 2012 conference in Nashville, I hope you had a chance to stop by Lavante’s booth and have your “catch the wave” photo taken!  Also, and more I hope you were able to attend one of Lavante’s five panel discussions that were headlined by some of the finest thought leaders in accounts payable today. We were so pleased to collaborate with so many experts in the AP field to develop and present these five very different, content-rich  presentations.  In an effort to recognize these individuals and their contributions to the AP industry, Lavante presented each panelists with a Lavante AP Thought Leadership Award.

We value the contributions made by these AP professionals.  They not only spent considerable time and effort to create the presentations, but they were all willing to openly share their individual experiences and perspectives about their companies and departments.  Ultimately, it is this type of interactive, open exchange that advances forward-thinking approaches and methodologies in the accounts payable field.  It is an honor to be part of these discussions and to work with such an experienced and insightful group of AP professionals.

We wanted to take a few minutes to recognize each of these experts who contributed so much to these panels and the AP industry:

  • •    Future of AP:  Five Ways to Drive Excellence & Increase the Value of AP
    Josh Morrison, Manager, Vendor Relations, C&S Wholesale Grocers, Inc
  • •    Supplier Portals 101:  What you Need for Effective Supplier Information Management Systems
    Desiree Clayton, Director, Nordstrom
    Tina McGlasson, AP Manager, Omnicare
    Jennifer Barnett, Former System Manager, Accounts Payable, Summa Health
  • •    Transforming AP through  Technology & Automation
    Kathy Sharp, Executive Director of Accounts Payable at MGM Resorts International
    Terri Dunn – Operations Manager, Transactions at Jones Lang LaSalle
    Jennifer Barnett – Former System Manager, Accounts Payable, Summa Health
    Fran Hammer, Manager, Disbursements & Travel, Hershey’s
  • •    Case of the Disappearing Credits
    Mary Schaeffer, Editorial Director and Publisher, Accounts Payable Now & Tomorrow
    Sharon Warmboe, Manager, Accounts Payable, Gilead
    Patty Gustaveson, Assistant Manager, Audit & Controls , Nordstrom
  • •    Cool Tools in AP
    Tom Lyman, Director of Accounts Payable, Saftey-Kleen
    Josh Campbell, Senior Finance Manager, Disbursements, Humana

If you want more information about the presentations and the Lavante AP Thought Leadership Awards presented at the conference, please contact me directly at joe.flynn@lavante.com.

Lavante Connect

divider image

Notes from the Field – AP Discussion Increases around the need for Effective Supplier Management Processes

Thursday, July 5th, 2012

AP professionals discuss industry trends at Lavante lunch & learnLast month I had the pleasure of visiting Minneapolis to participate in two separate events – a lunch & learn session co-sponsored by Lavante, Basware and the IOFM, followed by the Northern Lights IFO chapter meeting. Here, I’ll focus on discussions that took place at the first event, and I’ll return next week with some thoughts about the second presentation.

The lunch & learn which took place at a great steak house in downtown Minneapolis, The Future of AP: Five Changes Coming to AP, focused on some key challenges facing corporate AP professionals. In attendance were individuals from both small to large organizations and across a range of industries (manufacturing, retail, financial services, education, and healthcare).

As usual, the topic elicited much discussion, with considerable attention given to a challenge facing most of those in attendance–that of keeping their vendor master file accurate. While most attendees agreed that they perform an initial validation of the vendor data while setting up the vendor, there was not as high a consensus that they had an on-going system of checks and balances related to changes to existing vendors and on-boarding of new vendors. It was noted that there break-downs in this process caused many critical issues. For example, the same vendor can, and often does, get setup in the vendor master file multiple times. Or, as a result of mergers and acquisitions, related vendors are not identified. These issues can cause companies to miss purchase volume discounts as well as hinder their ability to take credits for returns. Additionally, it is impossible for the organization to calculate an accurate spend file by vendor, which can negatively impact contract negotiations. And this impacts not only finance, but procurement and in the end, the company’s bottom-line.

As we discussed at the event, there are multiple ways to handle the maintenance of data in the vendor master file, but the best practice which I adhered to during my tenure as Supervisor, AP at Rite Aid, is to:

  • • Start with a thorough cleansing of existing vendors.
  • • Incorporate an ongoing process that ensures new vendors are thoroughly analyzed, compared to the existing vendor master file, with updates made continually.

I found that the most efficient way to accomplish this was to partner with a third party company. Furthermore, that solution should have access to a vendor data network which can be leveraged to assure accuracy of the vendor master file. At the same time the use of a self-service portal application would allow vendors to update information as well as store required documents and validate TIN numbers — in real time. This type of supplier portal will increase collaboration between the buyer and supplier while providing a repeatable, ongoing process that ensures vendor information is accurate, complete and up-to-date.

Lavante has technology-enabled solutions to help deal with this and other related problems – Lavante Recovery+ and Lavante SIM (Supplier Information Management), which offer a way to automate many of these processes through our on-demand, SaaS-based software solutions. With them, users have a way to not only collaborate with suppliers via a web-based tool, but they allow complete visibility in the supplier base to identify related and duplicate vendors (all in real-time!), and to keep vendor information current. Part of this process is collecting and validating critical regulatory items – such as TIN matching and OFAC screening. And, the solutions leverage Lavante’s comprehensive supplier network, which increases vendor data accuracy and speeds up the cleansing process.

Here is one screen shot from the Lavante application showing the supplier compliance dashboard pharmaceutical company, demonstrating the number of suppliers which were updated and possible related suppliers identified through the update process.

For more information about Lavante solutions please visit www.lavante.com

I’ll have more notes on my second presentation in Minneapolis next week. In the meantime, please feel free to contact me with questions or comments.

Jeff Ulanoski, Sr. Consultant Lavante

 

divider image